A creditwrench student from Tulsa, Oklahoma tells how he won against a prominent Tulsa lawfirm in Tulsa County Court. There were two contributing factors to his win. He had been served with a summons and complaint but was called out of town for an extended period of time and could not reply to the plaintiff's discovery demands. When he returned he found that the plaintiff had filed for judgment based on his failure to respond to their discovery demands. He filed a response requesting more time to answer explaining why he had failed to respond, mailed his response to the plaintiff and at the same time sent his own demand for admissions. When he went to court the plaintiff dismissed the case. This was probably due to the fact that the plaintiff could not meet the defendant's demand for admissions of fact.

Listen to the words of the Tulsa, Oklahoma man as he describes what happened on the Friday night conference call for December 5th, 2008