Subject: | Deadlin tomorrow!! Answering Summons |
Question: | Hello, Not sure how I put it off to this point, but I have to answer a summons for a credit card debt, and the end of my 28 days to answer is tomorrow. I am already planning to file bankruptcy very soon. The essence of my question is: What can I legally and honestly deny or claim "lack of knowledge" about, without getting myself into unnecessary trouble and without causing any problem with my subsequent bankruptcy filing? Here are the details. I apologize for long-windedness, but I hope the the more information you have the more quickly and accurately you can reply. I've already done a lot of research, and I think I know what I need to put in my "Answer". I know how to format the answer and so forth. I only need to answer in order to buy time, avoid a default judgement, delay the judgement so I can file for bankruptcy. I want to avoid getting into any trouble by denying or admittin g too much. The allegations in the complaint are straightforward and essentially true. I do not believe I can deny the debt, but I can honestly say I do not know the amount claimed is correct. What I want to say in my answer is something like,"Defendent denies for lack of information the allegations in the following paragraphs: 1, 2, 3, 4", or maybe just "Defendent denies for lack fo information all allegations of the plaintiff". Have have typed in the paragraphs of the complaint (at teh bottom of this message). Basically I can deny certain knowledge of the specific amount in paragraph (1), as I do not have recent statements in my records. Of course, I have no reason to believe that the credit card company's record are incorrect. I am not sure that paragraph (2) is even considered an "allegation" that needs to be admitted or denied. Certainly 2(b) and (c) are not within my knowledge. Regarding 2(a) I cannot confirm that I have received statements every month. I have moved recently, and in truth I am careless with my mail. I do have a statement from several months earlier that cites a slightly smaller amount (i.e. less interest and late fees) than in their paragraph (1). Paragraph (3) refers to "this repayment obligation", since "this" must refer to the amount in paragraph (1), I think tat I can also say that I am unsure about paragraph (3) if unsure about paragraphs 1. Certainly I have a debt that is close to that stated in the claim, but do I have to admit that? Paragraph 4 mentions "the balance" rather than "this balance". Certainly I owe a balance and do not want to deny that. However, can I deny knowledge of the truth of paragraph 4 assuming it is again referring to the specific amount in paragraph 1? Obviously I do not want to make any false denials. I also do not want to claim "lack of knowledge" if when we sit down with a judge the judge is going to say something like "gimme a break, you had relatively recent statements, you knew the debt was at least $X, so you should have been more clear in your "Answer". -------------------------------- Here are the paragraphs of the complaint: 1) There is due the Plaintiff from teh defendant(s) upon a credit card account debt, account number #######, the sum of $#,###.##. 2) Attached hereto as exhibit "A" is an account statment attesting to the amount owed the plaintiff. The remaining account records are not attached hereto because, upon information and belief: (a) copies were sent month to the efendant(s), and are or were in Defendat(s)' possession, custody or control; (b) said records were archived by the Plaintiff; and/or (c) said account records may be voluminous. 3. Defendant(s) is in default on this repayment obligation. 4. Although due demand has been made, the Defendant has failed to liquidate the balance due and owing. |
Answer: | Sorry I'm late but I've been so busy helping people that I'm running behind in getting out my responses on this forum. I do hope you got your answer in on time even though it may not be the best you could have done. But if you got your answer in on time let's move on towards defeating the complaint. Let's move on from worrying about whether you actually owe the debt to what is it that the plaintiff has done wrong that you can use against him. In other words, get away from defensive thinking and shift to offensive thinking. That's the way you win cases if they can be won at all. First you say, "Obviously I do not want to make any false denials." What difference does it make if you do that or not? If you were guilty of a murder or other crime would you be wrong in denying the crime even though you know you did it? Of course not. When you deny you are basically only saying that you demand that they prove your guilt. It isn't lying or perjuring yourself. Nothing wrong with denials even if you know the allegations to be true. Secondly you say "I also do not want to claim "lack of knowledge" if when we sit down with a judge the judge is going to say something like "gimme a break, you had relatively recent statements, you knew the debt was at least $X, so you should have been more clear in your "Answer"." Judges sometimes do make such or similar statements but they are not allowed to do so. Your response to such questions from the bench should be an objection. Judges are supposed to listen to the evidence and testimoy before the court and make their decisions based on that and that alone. If the judge asks such leading questions and the defendant is so ignorant that he answers them instead of objecting to the questions then defendants deserve what they get. Creditwrench students know better than that. They know how to object and how to correctly explain the basis for their objections and if their objections are denied from the bench they know how to get their objections moved to a review by an appellate court. They learn about such things as how to quickly identify leading questions and what they can and cannot object to. They are provided with a fun computer program that teaches them what is objectionable, what is proper and how to object as well as what to do if the objection is overruled. You say that you are not sure that paragraph (2) is even considered an "allegation" that needs to be admitted or denied yet that is probably the first thing that should be attacked. A single statement is not nearly enough to prove a claim. The statement by the plaintiff's attorney is not even admissable because it plainly states that it is hear say. The mere fact that the phrase "upon information and belief" immediately telegraphs the fact that the attorney relies upon what he heard from someone else. He has no first hand knowledge about anything at all. Everything he states is hearsay and must be proven by testimony from a person or person having first hand knowledge of the facts alleged. That can be done through personal testimony or by affidavit. The attorney is actually begging not to be forced to procure the actual records from the plaintiff as he knows he is supposed to do and uses the excuse that those records may be voluminous. So what? Do your job and quit whining attorney. And account statements cannot attest to anything. They are copies and they are not even certified as being true and correct copies by the person who did the copying. Therefore they are not admissible in a court of law either. All of that makes little difference to corrupt judges who allow that kind of nonsense into their courts and get away with it because defendants have not learned how to effectively defend themselves against such outrageous conduct from a judicial system that cares not for the legal rights of defendants. 2) Attached hereto as exhibit "A" is an account statement attesting to the amount owed the plaintiff. The remaining account records are not attached hereto because, upon information and belief: (a) copies were sent month to the defendant(s), and are or were in Defendant(s)' possession, custody or control; (b) said records were archived by the Plaintiff; and/or (c) said account records may be voluminous. Creditwrench students learn how to do it the right way. Bill Bauer 405-684-9297 405-227-9423 RECOMMENDED READING: www.creditwrench.com/howjudgmentswork.html www.creditwrench.com/18questions.html www.creditwrench.com/Howtodefeatdebtcollectors How to set up your hard drive for creditwrench files. Makes them easy to find. http://consumers.creditwrench.com/sh...=7351#post7351 The Creditwrench conference calls will start this coming Friday evening at 7 P.M. Central time. It is free and open to the public. There is no cost or obligation other than what it may cost you for the phone call itself. You can join in and ask questions or just listen or whatever you want to do. Dial-in Number: (712) 432-1601 Access code: 508548# You might also want to visit our message forum at http://consumers.creditwrench.com to get answers to questions you need answered before next Friday night. If you live within driving distance of Oklahoma City you can also come to our monthly meeting of the Oklahoma City Chapter of Jurisdictionary meetings. They are held on the 2nd Thursday of each month at Coit's Root Beer Stand which is located on the corner of SW 24th & Western Ave in Oklahoma City. The meetings start promptly at 7:00 P.M. and last for 2 hours. Attendees usually arrive about half an hour early so they can enjoy a good meal at Coit's Root Beer Stand. The meetings are free and open to the public and we can discuss your problems as well if you like. We are going to start holding mock trials so that you can learn some court room procedures. |